Es mostren els missatges amb l'etiqueta de comentaris FACEBOOK. Mostrar tots els missatges
Es mostren els missatges amb l'etiqueta de comentaris FACEBOOK. Mostrar tots els missatges

14.5.16

Facebook Groups Act as Weapons Bazaars for Militias

By C. J. CHIVERS

 APRIL 6, 2016


A terrorist hoping to buy an antiaircraft weapon in recent years needed to look no further than Facebook, which has been hosting sprawling online arms bazaars, offering weapons ranging from handguns and grenades to heavy machine guns and guided missiles. 

The Facebook posts suggest evidence of large-scale efforts to sell military weapons coveted by terrorists and militants. The weapons include many distributed by the United States to security forces and their proxies in the Middle East. These online bazaars, which violate Facebook’s recent ban on the private sales of weapons, have been appearing in regions where the Islamic State has its strongest presence. 
This week, after The New York Times provided Facebook with seven examples of suspicious groups, the company shut down six of them. 

The findings were based on a study by the private consultancy Armament Research Services about arms trafficking on social media in Libya, along with reporting by The Times on similar trafficking in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. 

1. The Weapons Have Included Heavy Machine Guns and Heat-Seeking Missiles 
Many sales are arranged after Facebook users post photographs in closed and secret groups; the posts act roughly like digital classified ads on weapons-specific boards. Among the weapons displayed have been heavy machine guns on mounts that are designed for antiaircraft roles and that can be bolted to pickup trucks, and more sophisticated and menacing systems, including guided anti-tank missiles and an early generation of shoulder-fired heat-seeking antiaircraft missiles. 

The report documented 97 attempts at unregulated transfers of missiles, heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, rockets and anti-matériel rifles, used to disable military equipment, through several Libyan Facebook groups since September 2014. 


Last year ARES said it had documented an offer on Facebook to sell an SA-7 gripstock (pictured above), the reusable centerpiece of a manportable antiaircraft defense system, or Manpads, a weapon of the Stinger class. Many of these left Libyan state custody in 2011, as depots were raided by rebels and looters. ARES said it documented Libyan sellers claiming to have two complete SA-7s for sale, two additional missiles and three gripstocks. An old system, SA-7s are a greater threat to helicopters and commercial aircraft than to modern military jets. 
2. Others Are the Standard Arms of Militant and Terrorist Groups 
Machine guns and missiles form a small fraction of the apparent arms trafficking on Facebook and other social media apps, according to Nic R. Jenzen-Jones, the director of ARES and an author of the report. Examinations by The Times of Facebook groups in Libya dedicated to arms sales showed that sellers sought customers for a much larger assortment of handguns and infantry weapons. The rifles have predominantly been Kalashnikov assault rifles, which are used by many militants in the region, and many FN FAL rifles, which are common in Libya. All of these solicitations violate Facebook’s policies, which since January has forbidden the facilitation of private sales of firearms and other weapons, according to Monika Bickert, a former federal prosecutor who is responsible for developing and enforcing the company’s content standards. 

3. Weapons Sales Greased by Social Media Sites Have Become a Feature of Many Conflicts 
The use of social media for arms sales is relatively new to Libya. Until a Western-backed uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi in 2011, which ended in his death at the hands of an armed mob, the country had a tightly restricted arms market and limited Internet access. But social media-based weapons markets in Libya are not unique. Similar markets exist in other countries plagued in recent years by conflict, militant groups and terrorism, including arms-sales Facebook groups in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. 

On Monday, The Times shared links for seven such groups with Facebook to check whether they violated the rules. By Tuesday, Facebook had taken down six of the groups. Ms. Bickert said that one Facebook group — which displayed photographs of weapons but only discussed them and expressly forbade sales — had survived the company’s scrutiny. 
4. Facebook’s Rules on Arms Sales Are Related to Changes in How Facebook Is Used. 
Ms. Bickert described the company’s policies as evolutionary, reflecting shifts in its social media ecosystem. 

When Facebook began, there was no way to really engage in commerce on Facebook,” she said. But in the past year, she noted, the company has allowed users to process payments through its Messenger service, and has added other features to aid sales. “Since we were offering features like that, we thought we wanted to make clear that this is not a site that wants to facilitate the private sales of firearms.” 

It is not clear how extensive arms trafficking on the site has been, but the rate of new posts has been unmistakably brisk, with many groups offering several new weapons a day. Mr. Jenzen-Jones said that ARES documented 250 to 300 posts about arms sales each month on the Libya sites alone, and that sales appeared to be trending up. Over all, using data from arms-sales Facebook groups across the Middle East, he said, “We’ve got about 6,000 trades documented, but it’s probably much bigger than that.” 

5. Facebook Relies on Users to Report the Arms Trafficking It Bans 
Ms. Bickert said the most important part of Facebook’s effort “to keep people safe” was to make it easy for users to notify the company of suspected violations, which can be done with a click on the “Report” feature on every Facebook post. 

In this way so-called Community Operations teams — Facebook employees who review the reports in dozens of languages — can examine and remove offending content. How effective the policy is, in practice, is unclear. Several groups from which the photographs for this article were downloaded operated on Facebook for two years or more, accumulating thousands of members before Facebook announced its ban on arms sales. 

This trafficking occurred in countries where the Islamic State is at its most active and where armed militias or other designated terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda, have a persistent presence. In all four countries, government forces do not control large areas of territory and civil society is under intense pressure. Christine Chen, a Facebook spokeswoman, said the company relied on the nearly 1.6 billion people who visit the site every month to flag offenders. “We urge everyone who sees violations to report them to us,” she said. 
6. In Libya, Widespread Pistol Sales on Facebook 
ARES has documented many types of buyers and sellers. These include private citizens seeking handguns as well as representatives of armed groups buying weapons that require crews to be operated effectively, or appearing to offload weapons that the militias no longer wanted. Different markets have different characteristics. In Libya, fear of crime seemed to drive many people to buy pistols, Mr. Jenzen-Jones said. 

Handguns are disproportionately represented,” he said. “They are widely sought after — primarily for self-defense and particularly to protect against carjackings — with many prospective buyers placing ‘wanted’ posts.” They were also expensive, ranging from about $2,200 to more than $7,000 — a sign that demand outstrips supply. 

7. Weapons Provided to Allies in Iraq Have Filled Facebook Sales Pages 
In Iraq, the Facebook arms bazaars can resemble inside looks at the failures of American train-and-equip programs, with sellers displaying a seemingly bottomless assortment of weapons provided to Iraq’s government forces by the Pentagon during the long American occupation. Those include M4 carbines, M16 rifles, M249 squad automatic weapons, MP5 submachine guns and Glock semiautomatic pistols. Many of the weapons shown still bear inventory stickers and aftermarket add-ons favored by American forces and troops. 

Such weapons have long been available on black markets in Iraq, with or without advertising on social media. But Facebook and other social media companies seem to provide new opportunities for sellers and buyers to find one other easily; for sellers to display items to more customers; and for customers to peruse and haggle over a larger assortment of weapons than what is available in smaller, physical markets. 

8. In Syria, Weapons Identical to Those Distributed to Rebels by the United States Are Offered for Sale 
Similarly, weapons identical to those provided by the United States to Syrian rebels have also been traded on Facebook and other social media or messaging apps. In one recent example, a seller in northern Syria — who identified himself as a student, photographer and sniper — offered a pristine-looking Kalashnikov assault rifle that he said came from the Hazm Movement, which received weapons from the United States before the movement was defeated by the Nusra Front, a Qaeda affiliate. He noted on Facebook that the rifle was new and had “never fired a shot,” and hinted of either a bonus gift or a discount.

In another example, from October, a Facebook arms-trading group offered a “new TOW launcher,” referring to a wire-guided anti-tank missile system of the same type provided to rebels by the United States and other countries. The post included a phone number for the seller, which linked to WhatsApp, a messaging service. Reached on WhatsApp this week, the seller, whose profile picture shows the face of a corpse, said that he had sold the launcher but added, unconvincingly, that he could not recall the price. 
9. Social Media Pages Help Armed Groups Find Other Military Equipment 
Items offered for sale on Facebook in Libya also included much of the other equipment sought by militias or terrorists for their operations. These included ammunition, bulletproof plates for flak jackets, rifle scopes, hand grenades, two-way tactical radios, fragmenting antipersonnel warheads for rocket-propelled grenade launchers, uniforms (including police uniforms) and forward-looking infrared cameras, used for night imaging. 

Ms. Bickert said that using Facebook to help sell items not considered weapons, like bulletproof plates, did not violate the company’s rules. Since the same groups selling plates were also selling weapons, however, they were removed this week. 

Online arms trafficking of this magnitude is an “eye opener,” said Nicolas Florquin, research coordinator for the Small Arms Survey, the Geneva-based international research center that underwrote the ARES study, part of an effort to supplement trafficking investigations by the United Nations Panel of Experts. Without addressing Facebook or any particular social-media company directly, he added, “Obviously there has to be more attention to monitoring and controlling it.” 
10. Facebook Groups Also Offer Residents a Means to Flee 
One of the arms-trading pages that Facebook took down this week included a stray advertisement, among ones for weapons and crates of 82- millimeter mortar rounds. It was for people looking to escape the miseries and dangers that have settled over some of the territory where such Facebook pages have been a feature of the arms trade. The advertisement offered open-ocean boat rides. Passage to Greece, it said, was “guaranteed.” The advertisement was of a type. In a region struggling with large-scale violence and overrun by militias, terrorists and the many forces fighting them, Facebook groups dedicated to refugee trafficking promise the chance to escape. 

Karam Shoumali contributed reporting from Turkey, and Shuaib Almosawa from Yemen. 


24.11.15

"Dark Internet" inhibits law enforcement's ability to identify, track terrorists

Posted on Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 8:29 AM 

For several months, Islamic State militants have been using instant messaging apps which encrypt or destroy conversations immediately. This has inhibit U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies from identifying and monitoring suspected terrorists, even when a court order is granted, because messaging companies and app developers say they are unable to unlock the coded conversations and/or do not have a record of the conversations. “We’re past going dark in certain instances,” said Michael B. Steinbach, the FBI’s top counterterrorism official. “We are dark.” 

For several months, Islamic State militants have been using instant messaging apps which encrypt or destroy conversations immediately. This has inhibit U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies from identifying and monitoring suspected terrorists, even when a court order is granted, because messaging companies and app developers say they are unable to unlock the coded conversations and/or do not have a record of the conversations. 

We’re past going dark in certain instances,” said Michael B. Steinbach, the FBI’s top counterterrorism official. “We are dark.” 

FBI officials want Congress to expand their authority to monitor apps such as WhatsApp and Kik, as well as data-deleting apps such as Wickr and Surespot, used by hundreds of millions of people, including terrorists and their supporters, because they guarantee security and anonymity. 

About 200,000 people worldwide are exposed to “terrorist messaging” daily from ISIS supporters via direct messaging, online videos, or social media posts. ISIS recruiters also monitor Twitter and Facebook to connect with individuals who share the group’s posts, often inviting them to private conversations over encrypted or data-deleting apps. 

FBI officials fear that law enforcement agencies are missing important clues about potential plots as terror-linked conversations go from social media to private messaging apps. The FBI has arrested nearly forty people since last summer on the suspicion of seeking to support terrorist groups. A vast majority of those people communicated their intentions through social media. Last Tuesday, an FBI agent and a Boston police officer shot and killed a 26-year old former security guard in Roslindale, Massachusetts after he allegedly lunged at them with a knife. The FBI had been tracking his social media communications with ISIS for at least several days. 

ISIS and its supporters are now increasingly communicating via secure and encrypted messaging platforms. “These tactics are a sea change for spreading terror, and they require from us a paradigm shift in our counter-terrorism, intelligence and our operations,” Representative Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said last Wednesday at a congressional hearing. 

The Los Angeles Times reports that FBI officials have not disclosed details of cases in which private messaging apps have been used by terrorists, but they have appealed to tech and software companies to work with law enforcement to monitor suspected terrorist communications. 

Apple chief executive Tim Cook in a 1 June speech at the annual awards dinner for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, defended his company’s decision to encrypt the content of Facetime and iMessage communications. He lashed out at government officials who have asked Apple and other tech firms to create a backdoor key to encrypted messages. “Let me be crystal clear,” Cook said. “Weakening encryption or taking it away harms good people that are using it for the right reasons. And ultimately, I believe it has a chilling effect on our 1st Amendment rights and undermines our country’s founding principles.” 

At last Wednesday’s congressional hearing, Steinbach said that the FBI seeks a legal way to access stored text messages and active communications in suspected terrorism cases. “We’re talking about going before the court, whether the criminal court or the national security court, with evidence, a burden of proof, probable cause, suggesting a crime has been committed or, in our case, that there’s a terrorist,” he said. 

We’re not looking at going through a backdoor or being nefarious,” he said. 

We are imploring Congress to help us seek legal remedies toward that as well as asking the companies to provide technological solutions to help that,” Steinbach said. Public demand for e-mail and text messaging services which guarantee security and anonymity has risen since Edward Snowden leaked details about the NSA’s bulk data collection program. Still, federal officials want tech companies to know the risk associated with their services. “It is important for those who are providing the services to understand what the threats are and to be responsible … in terms of taking action to prevent designated terrorist groups from using their services to try to get people to commit terrorist acts here,” John Carlin, head of national security for the Justice Department, said in a recent interview. 

While ISIS seems to have successfully mastered how to use social media to recruit new followers, the medium has its weaknesses. Air Force analysts at Hurlburt Field, Florida recently helped destroy a command center in Syria after a militant revealed enough information online to disclose his position. “The (airmen are) combing through social media and they see some moron standing at this command,” Gen. Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle, head of Air Combat Command at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, said in a speech on 1 June, according to Air Force Times. “And in some social media, open forum, bragging about command and control capabilities for (ISIS). And these guys go, ‘Ah, we got an in.’” 

So they do some work. Long story short, about 22 hours later through that very building, three (‘smart’ bombs) take that entire building out. Through social media. It was a post on social media. Bombs on target in 22 hours,” he said. “It was incredible work, and incredible airmen doing this sort of thing.” 

ISIS, however, has been aware of the vulnerabilities of social media. Last fall, the group’s leaders issued an order forbidding fighters to photograph attacks and locations without permission from the group’s general council. The Times notes that ISIS also distributed a guide to removing geo-location and metadata from cell phone images

Homeland Security News Wire, June 10, 2015

13.12.11

Shunning Facebook, and Living to Tell About It

December 13, 2011
By

Tyson Balcomb quit Facebook after a chance encounter on an elevator. He found himself standing next to a woman he had never met — yet through Facebook he knew what her older brother looked like, that she was from a tiny island off the coast of Washington and that she had recently visited the Space Needle in Seattle.

“I knew all these things about her, but I’d never even talked to her,” said Mr. Balcomb, a pre-med student in Oregon who had some real-life friends in common with the woman. “At that point I thought, maybe this is a little unhealthy.”

As Facebook prepares for a much-anticipated public offering, the company is eager to show off its momentum by building on its huge membership: more than 800 million active users around the world, Facebook says, and roughly 200 million in the United States, or two-thirds of the population.

But the company is running into a roadblock in this country. Some people, even on the younger end of the age spectrum, just refuse to participate, including people who have given it a try.

One of Facebook’s main selling points is that it builds closer ties among friends and colleagues. But some who steer clear of the site say it can have the opposite effect of making them feel more, not less, alienated.

“I wasn’t calling my friends anymore,” said Ashleigh Elser, 24, who is in graduate school in Charlottesville, Va. “I was just seeing their pictures and updates and felt like that was really connecting to them.”

To be sure, the Facebook-free life has its disadvantages in an era when people announce all kinds of major life milestones on the Web. Ms. Elser has missed engagements and pictures of new-born babies. But none of that hurt as much as the gap she said her Facebook account had created between her and her closest friends. So she shut it down.

Many of the holdouts mention concerns about privacy. Those who study social networking say this issue boils down to trust. Amanda Lenhart, who directs research on teenagers, children and families at the Pew Internet and American Life Project, said that people who use Facebook tend to have “a general sense of trust in others and trust in institutions.” She added: “Some people make the decision not to use it because they are afraid of what might happen.”

Ms. Lenhart noted that about 16 percent of Americans don’t have cellphones. “There will always be holdouts,” she said.

Facebook executives say they don’t expect everyone in the country to sign up. Instead they are working on ways to keep current users on the site longer, which gives the company more chances to show them ads. And the company’s biggest growth is now in places like Asia and Latin America, where there might actually be people who have not yet heard of Facebook.

“Our goal is to offer people a meaningful, fun and free way to connect with their friends, and we hope that’s appealing to a broad audience,” said Jonathan Thaw, a Facebook spokesman.

But the figures on growth in this country are stark. The number of Americans who visited Facebook grew 10 percent in the year that ended in October — down from 56 percent growth over the previous year, according to comScore, which tracks Internet traffic.

Ray Valdes, an analyst at Gartner, said this slowdown was not a make-or-break issue ahead of the company’s public offering, which could come in the spring. What does matter, he said, is Facebook’s ability to keep its millions of current users entertained and coming back.

“They’re likely more worried about the novelty factor wearing off,” Mr. Valdes said. “That’s a continual problem that they’re solving, and there are no permanent solutions.”

Erika Gable, 29, who lives in Brooklyn and does public relations for restaurants, never understood the appeal of Facebook in the first place. She says the daily chatter that flows through the site — updates about bad hair days and pictures from dinner — is virtual clutter she doesn’t need in her life.

“If I want to see my fifth cousin’s second baby, I’ll call them,” she said with a laugh.

Ms. Gable is not a Luddite. She has an iPhone and sometimes uses Twitter. But when it comes to creating a profile on the world’s biggest social network, her tolerance reaches its limits.

“I remember having MySpace for a bit and always feeling so weird about seeing other people’s stuff all the time,” she said. “I’m not into it.”

Will Brennan, a 26-year-old Brooklyn resident, said he had “heard too many horror stories” about the privacy pitfalls of Facebook. But he said friends are not always sympathetic to his anti-social-media stance.

“I get asked to sign up at least twice a month,” said Mr. Brennan. “I get harangued for ruining their plans by not being on Facebook.”

And whether there is haranguing involved or not, the rebels say their no-Facebook status tends to be a hot topic of conversation — much as a decision not to own a television might have been in an earlier media era.

“People always raise an eyebrow,” said Chris Munns, 29, who works as a systems administrator in New York. “But my life has gone on just fine without it. I’m not a shut-in. I have friends and quite an enjoyable life in Manhattan, so I can’t say it makes me feel like I’m missing out on life at all.”

But the peer pressure is only going to increase. Susan Etlinger, an analyst at the Altimeter Group, said society was adopting new behaviors and expectations in response to the near-ubiquity of Facebook and other social networks.

“People may start to ask the question that, if you aren’t on social channels, why not? Are you hiding something?” she said. “The norms are shifting.”

This kind of thinking cuts both ways for the Facebook holdouts. Mr. Munns said his dating life had benefited from his lack of an online dossier: “They haven’t had a chance to dig up your entire life on Facebook before you meet.”

But Ms. Gable said such background checks were the one thing she needed Facebook for.

“If I have a crush on a guy, I’ll make my friends look him up for me,” Ms. Gable said. “But that’s as far as it goes.”

30.7.11

Iceland’s citizens help draft new constitution via the Internet

In a possible world-first, Iceland’s citizens have helped draft a new constitution via social networks such as Facebook and Twitter. The draft document has been presented to Iceland’s parliamentary speaker.

A council of 25 ordinary, publicly-elected Icelandic citizens presented a draft constitution to Iceland's parliamentary speaker Asta Ragnheidur Johannesdottir on Friday. This may be the first time that citizens have actively contributed suggestions via the Internet and were able to follow progress on social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Flickr.

The constitution of the island nation of 320,000 people was first instituted in 1944. The Icelandic parliament, known as Althingi, agreed in 2010 that the country's citizens should be involved to include their viewpoint, on the core values of the constitution.

The council began work on the draft constitution in April. During this time, its work was posted on the Internet. Icelanders submitted around 1,600 propositions and comments on the council's website.


People pressure

"The reaction from the public was very important," said Salvor Nordal, the head of constitutional council. Most of the suggestions had to do with a revised economic model, following Iceland's economic collapse in 2008. All Iceland's major banks failed at the time, leading the country to the brink of economic collapse.


"This triggered massive social movements, and mounted pressure to revamp the constitution, and for the process to be led by ordinary citizens," said council member Silja Omarsdottir.

Some of the suggestions were extreme or even bizzare. One suggested that Iceland's natural resources were to be designated public property and no private organization or individuals would be permitted to own them or the rights connected to them. Another proposal wanted to "kill all capitalists."

Johannesdottir said the draft would be examined by a parliamentary committee starting on October 1.

Author: Wilhelmina Lyffyt (AFP, dpa)
Editor: Nicole Goebel

10.7.11

The UK and digital democracy

by Duncan Smith
Producer, BBC Parliament

Twitter, Facebook, smartphones and iPad-type devices have all contributed to a change in the way many politicians at Westminster work.

The technological revolution has spread visibly into the Commons chamber over the past couple of years, with MPs now allowed to check and send messages using their phones.

In most Commons sessions, including in committees, members can often be seen tapping out messages on their shiny iPhone/Blackberry/Samsung/HTC devices.

The sharp eyed viewer can then check the MP's Twitter feed and see that they were sending a tweet (a message restricted to 140 letters and spaces) letting the world know what's happening and what they think of it.

If you're not going to get called by the Speaker to have your say in Parliament, it can be the next best thing.

The new technology "is exciting and opens up democracy, freedom of expression to loads of people", Conservative backbencher Kris Hopkins said at a Hansard Society event looking at the digital agenda a year on from the general election.

But he added the warning: "They also open up opportunities to nutters to create platforms."

Addressing the meeting Mr Hopkins warned that while MPs welcomed new and innovative ways to communicate with voters - they also received a lot of offensive communications.

It's about liberating all of that data, making it free for people to do creative things with it without the state or market or other people putting constrains on them but giving them the freedom to do something interesting
Julian Huppert Lib Dem MP

He added: "I have to say I have some wonderful constituents who write with amazing issues and dramas and I have got a fantastic office. But I have also got some lunatics out there who think they have the right to abuse me."

Mr Hopkins explained that a lack of control of modern communications led to problems.

"Racists, sexist, homophobic drivel that I get from some members of the public. Some of it is really based around hatred and there is no control of that," he said.

But transparent government is something Mr Hopkins supports.

With reference specifically to money spent by the NHS he said: "We're spending huge amounts of money and we've got to be able to scrutinise it and we've got to make sure individual people are safe from people rooting around just being nosy.

"But when we're spending money like that, it should be transparent."

The idea of more open data was supported by Liberal Democrat MP Julian Huppert, who was also taking part in the debate.

Dr Huppert has nearly 4,000 Twitter followers (people who will automatically see any tweet he sends when they check their Twitter account).

"I find Twitter fantastically useful… it's a very fast way for me to do things," he explained.

Twitter, he said, enabled constituents to find out what meetings he was attending, and to suggest points that could be raised - all in virtual real time.

Voting lobbies

"I want my constituents in four years' time to think I've worked really hard and know what I've done. So people who follow me know the things that I do… it's a very cheap, very easy way to keep that flow going.

He said: "I think Twitter is incredibly powerful as a way of giving people an idea of what some of us do with our lives."

And he said that in general "letting data go free allows people to do some fascinating things with it".

He explained that - unless there were good reasons not to - his view was that government should make all public data free and available for use by the public themselves.

"Ultimately, from a philosophical perspective, it's a great liberal thing to do. It's about liberating all of that data, making it free for people to do creative things with it without the state or market or other people putting constrains on them but giving them the freedom to do something interesting."

One particularly archaic way business is done in the Houses of Parliament was, however, praised by both MPs - despite their enthusiasm for increased electronic democracy: the process of divisions (votes).

Currently MPs have to physically walk through the Aye or the No lobby to register their votes, in a process that takes at least 15 minutes.

"Voting is a very good example of the antiquated way the House of Commons does things," said Mr Huppert.

But that was not a bad thing, he said, because gathering in the division lobbies was often the only time backbench MPs got to meet ministers and allowed a lot of business to get done quickly and quietly.

So even as the new forms of digital communication changes some of the ways of life at Westminster, it seems in some cases at least, some old fashioned face to face networking might yet be best.

Story from BBC NEWS:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/democracylive/hi/comment/newsid_9514000/9514955.stm
Published: 2011/06/2011

13.1.11

Las amistades que no son tales

Con un poco de retraso, les comparto "La red parasocial", artículo de reflexión de Ernesto Hernández Busto publicado en El País a raíz de "La Red Social" la película sobre Facebook. ¿Será cierto que todas nuestras relaciones - no sólo las personales, sino también las políticas y empáticas - se están aligerando en respuesta a la gratificación voluntaria de la red?.

13.12.10

Libertad de expresión

Aquel proverbio de "no hagas a otro lo que no quieras que te hagan a tí", en México se utiliza también citando a un expresidente y estadista, Benito Juárez: "el respeto al derecho ajeno es la paz". Pero... ¿y cuando el derecho ajeno atropella los tuyos?

Es interesante este artículo del NYT sobre cómo Facebook trata de mantener a la raya a los grupos de odio p de discriminación sin pisar en las capacidades de libertad de expresión de la gente que usa la red social. Me hizo pensar, necesariamente, en este otro artículo sobre la importancia de la autoregulación y el manejo responsable del cierto "anonimato" que provee la red.

10.10.10

FACEBOOK, ARA LA PEL.LÍCULA


S'acaba d'estrenar la pel.lícula The Social Network que tracta sobre l'origen del Facebook. Només he vist els tràilers a la xarxa, i m'ha agradat el tall que diu "No pots fer 500 milions d'amics... sense fer uns quants enemics"... bona aquesta. Caldrà anar-la a veure. A ningú no se li escapa que ha esdevingut un dels referents fonamentals de la societat xarxa, tant en el seu vessant positiu, com també malauradament, negatiu.

En seguirem parlant.

24.8.10

Y si Facebook fuera un país...

Con la llegada del usuario 500 millones a Facebook, la compañía FlipTop de empresas en línea decidió hacer una comparación con el crecimiento de los países - como si facebook fuera un país. No se pierdan el cuadro completo aquí.

Además, recomiendo mucho este artículo de Netpolitique sobre los "challenges" o concursos como una nueva manera de promoción y activación de la participación pública. Igual, por ejemplo, si Hereu hubiese lanzado una campaña de participación de este tipo para ideas en la Diagonal - la lanzaron, sí, pero no con premios ni con presentaciones claras - le hubiera resultado mucho más rentable que la consulta del mal.

Saludos!

14.4.10

Avisos para navegantes con intenciones de voto

Ayer apareció una nota en La Vanguardia en donde se comunica que a la gente se le preguntará al entrar a Facebook si se ha registrado o no para votar - todo esto como parte de un programa para aumentar la participación en las elecciones. Lo que no tengo claro es cómo se hará: ¿con un anuncio en la barra lateral? ¿como una alerta al hacer tu log-in? ¿quién verá el anuncio - los que tienen su residencia establecida en Inglaterra según los registros de Facebook? Y quizá lo más importante de todo: ¿cuánto cobrará Facebook por esto?. Entre esto y los rumores sobre anuncios en twitter, cada vez se complica más el panorama de las redes sociales.

8.3.10

¿Y después de Facebook qué?

En un medio en el que los one hit wonders son regulares, comienzan a aparecer malos presagios al respecto de Facebook. ¿Cuál será la siguiente invención que lo desbanque? ¿Qué lo hará quedarse? Ya que Buzz no parece tener mayor relevancia, parece que se quedará... y que con Facebook Connect sus dueños están haciendo lo que Starbucks: canibalizarse el propio negocio.

... Mientras no les pase lo que a Starbucks y comiencen a cerrar masivamente...

Un artículo de Randall Stross en el NYT sobre el tema aquí.

14.12.09

Los límites de la amistad

Ahora en Estados Unidos, en concreto en Florida, los jueces y los abogados no pueden ser "amigos" de Facebook. La idea, al parecer, es evitar malos entiendos y aparencias de acuerdos personales. ¿Qué profesiones continuarán? La nota del NYT aquí.

1.9.09

El éxodo

Poco a poco, Facebook se va convirtiendo en el nuevo "demonio" contemporáneo. La semana pasada los medios estaban llenos con noticias sobre su "influencia negativa" en la relaciones. Esta semana, el NYT publica un artículo sobre el supuesto "éxodo" de gente que ya no quiere estar "sujeta" a las redes sociales.

¿Será que, al igual que le pasó en su momento a la televisión, se convertirá en el depositario de todas las culpas?

7.8.09

LES XARXES SOCIALS PROHIBIDES AL COS DE MARINES

Una ordre del cos de Marines dels Estats Units de principis d'aquesta setmana acaba de prohibir als seus membres l'ús de les xarxes socials de lliure accés (no inclou, doncs, les internes del Departament de Defensa i del propi cos), tals com Twitter, Facebook, entre d'altres.

Segons l'ordre, les XX.SS. "(in general) are proven a haven for malicious actors and content and are particularly high risk due to information exposure, user generated content and targeting by adversaries". Bufa!

La prohibició durarà en principi un any, i en l'ordre s'inclou la possibilitat que, en determinades circumstàncies, alguns membres del cos puguin obtenir un permís per usar-les.

Segons els impulsors de la mesura, les xarxes socials no van ser creades amb l'objectiu de primar la seguretat i la protecció i això les fa especialment vulnerables a persones amb males intencions.

Per contra, els Marines consideren claus en la seva actuació tant l'OPSEC (seguretat operacional) com la COMSEC (seguretat de les comunicacions).

De moment la mesura no s'aplica als altres serveis militars (Army, Navy i Air Force), però tot i així, es tracta d'una iniciativa que sembla marcar un camí de futur.

En principi, la mesura no sembla afectar els ja famosos milblogs (blocs escrits pels militars, molts d'ells en el servei actiu a l'Irak i l'Afganistan), si bé aquests ja fa temps que estan sotmesos a un control quotidià per part de l'administració militar, que fins i tot ha fet que molts dels seus autors optin per tancar-los per evitar possibles represàlies bé dels seus comandants immediats, bé de la jerarquia.

28.1.09

Nuevas tendencias

No hace tanto que tomábamos el curso estuvimos discutiendo ampliamente sobre las posibilidades de Second Life. Ya existía Facebook, pero no era tan omnipresente como hoy. Y ahora resulta que Second Life está nominado a los "Fiasco Awards", nacidos aquí en Catalunya para definir a los mayores fiascos tecnológicos. La plataforma, alimentada desde los headquarters telecos catalanes es, por decir lo menos, simpática. En los siguientes links, la página de los Fiasco Awards (se puede votar y todo) y la noticia según la reporta La Vanguardia.

También en La Vanguardia de hoy hay una nota sobre cómo los usuarios de Tuenti están considerando un grupo de apoyo para buscar a una adolescente perdida... ¿qué habría pasado con el caso Madeleine McCain en la época Facebook? Claro... esto suponiendo que los McCains tuvieran un Facebook.

Supe de un amigo que se volvió figura pública en mi país y tuvo que quitar su perfil de Facebook después de que varias fotos (que no tenían la aprobación de su consultora de imagen) fueron a dar a los medios electrónicos "cortesía" de Facebook. ¿En qué situación hay que cerrar la cuenta de uno?

12.11.07

My Network, My Cause

El New York Times d'avui publica un article força interessant sobre les xarxes socials. El podeu llegir aquí, i si us sembla el podem comentar en la sessió de dijous.

Josep